CVE-2026-75745: Adobe AEM Forms JEE Flaw
TL;DR - CVE-2026-75745 is an incorrect-authorization flaw in Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE with potential arbitrary code execution impact. - Adobe rates it 9.8 critical; NVD currently reports 10.0. The published vector describes a network-reachable flaw requiring no authentication or user interaction. - It is not listed in CISA KEV, and no public proof of concept or confirmed exploitation was identified in the reviewed sources. - Verify affected and fixed versions in Adobe APSB26-151 and prioritize exposed installations for remediation.
Summary
CVE-2026-75745 affects Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE. The published vulnerability description identifies an incorrect authorization condition, classified as CWE-863, that could allow arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Adobe describes the issue as critical.
The available records do not disclose the vulnerable endpoint, exploit chain, or affected build numbers. Until Adobe’s version matrix is confirmed, organizations should treat deployed AEM Forms JEE instances as potentially affected if they fall within the product scope.
| Field | Assessment |
|---|---|
| CVE ID | CVE-2026-75745 |
| CVSS score | Adobe: 9.8; NVD: 10.0 |
| Attack vector | Network |
| Authentication or privileges required | None according to Adobe’s CVSS vector |
| User interaction | None |
| Patch status | Adobe security bulletin published; exact affected and fixed versions were not available in the supplied advisory data |
| CISA KEV | Not listed as of 2026-09-22 |
| Impact | Arbitrary code execution |
The CVSS discrepancy matters operationally. Adobe publishes:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
This produces a 9.8 score. NVD currently reports 10.0 but does not provide a vector in the supplied record. The difference should not be treated as a meaningful reduction in risk.
Analyst’s Take: The immediate priority is version validation, not exploit-signature development. The vulnerability is network-reachable and requires no authentication or user interaction according to Adobe’s vector, while the endpoint and exploit chain remain undisclosed.
Root Cause
The root cause is an incorrect authorization vulnerability mapped to CWE-863. A sensitive operation may be reachable without a sufficient authorization decision, allowing an attacker to invoke functionality that should be limited to an appropriately privileged identity.
The public description does not identify the specific request, endpoint, authorization rule, or code component involved. The stated impact is arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user.
Adobe’s vector indicates that exploitation requires no privileges and no user interaction. The changed-scope designation indicates that consequences may extend beyond the vulnerable component’s original security authority. These characteristics increase the risk for any instance reachable by untrusted clients, even though the exact exploit mechanics remain undisclosed.
A login portal, reverse proxy, or network ACL does not completely eliminate the risk. Those controls can reduce exposure, but they are not a substitute for the vendor update. An attacker may still reach the service through an internal foothold, compromised trusted network, or overly broad application gateway rule.
Who’s Exposed
The affected product is Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE. The supplied NVD data does not provide a precise affected version range, and the available extraction of Adobe bulletin APSB26-151 does not expose a complete affected-version table.
A reliable statement such as “versions X through Y are affected” cannot be made from the available evidence. Inventory every deployment of AEM Forms JEE, including:
- Clustered nodes
- Standby systems
- Disaster-recovery environments
- Test and staging instances
- Systems behind an application delivery controller
- Internet-facing and partner-accessible deployments
Treat a deployment as potentially exposed until its installed build is checked against the version matrix in Adobe APSB26-151.
The fixed version is also not present in the supplied records. Adobe’s bulletin is the authoritative source for the applicable update and target build. Do not substitute an AEM Sites, AEM Forms on OSGi, or unrelated Adobe Experience Manager update for the JEE-specific remediation unless Adobe explicitly identifies it as applicable.
Severity Breakdown
Adobe’s CVSS v3.1 vector is:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Its components describe a highly accessible vulnerability:
| Component | Value | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector | Network | The attack can be delivered over a network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | No unusual conditions are required |
| Privileges Required | None | The attacker does not need an account or existing privilege |
| User Interaction | None | A victim does not need to click or approve an action |
| Scope | Changed | Impact can cross the vulnerable component’s security authority |
| Confidentiality | High | Sensitive data may be disclosed |
| Integrity | High | Data or system state may be modified |
| Availability | High | Service disruption or system compromise may result |
Adobe reports 9.8, while NVD reports 10.0. Both assessments place the vulnerability in the critical range and support rapid validation and remediation of exposed installations.
Exploitation Status
CVE-2026-75745 is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog as of 2026-09-22. No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation was identified in the supplied research.
The absence of a KEV entry means CISA has not cataloged confirmed exploitation for this CVE; it does not prove that exploitation has never occurred.
No public proof-of-concept repository or exploit was identified in the reviewed sources. The current assessment is:
- Public proof of concept: Not known
- Confirmed active exploitation: Not known
- CISA KEV listing: Absent as of the review date
These statuses can change quickly after disclosure, especially for a network-reachable flaw with no stated privilege or interaction requirement.
The risk remains high despite the absence of public exploitation evidence. Attackers may independently reverse-engineer a patch, discover the vulnerable authorization path, or exploit an exposed service before public reporting catches up. Internet-facing and partner-accessible Forms JEE systems should receive priority.
For broader context on defensive behavior mapping, see the MITRE ATT&CK glossary.
Validation Checklist
Use the following checklist to document remediation:
- [ ] Every AEM Forms JEE deployment has been identified.
- [ ] Internet-facing and partner-accessible instances have been prioritized.
- [ ] Installed release and build numbers have been recorded.
- [ ] Versions have been compared with Adobe APSB26-151.
- [ ] The Adobe-approved fixed release has been obtained.
- [ ] Updates have been applied to all relevant nodes.
- [ ] Network restrictions remain in place where appropriate.
- [ ] Application, operating-system, endpoint, and proxy logs have been reviewed.
- [ ] Suspicious child processes and outbound connections have been investigated.
- [ ] Credentials or tokens have been rotated where compromise is suspected.
- [ ] Post-update functionality and version state have been verified.
Sources
| Source | Relevance |
|---|---|
| Adobe Security Bulletin APSB26-151 | Vendor severity, CVSS vector, affected product, and authoritative remediation guidance |
| NVD record for CVE-2026-75745 | CVE description, CWE-863 classification, and NVD CVSS assessment |
| CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | Exploitation-status cross-check; CVE-2026-75745 was not listed at review time |
| MITRE ATT&CK updates and analysis | Additional defensive context for threat detection and behavior analysis |
Use the vendor bulletin as the authority for the affected version range and fixed build. Because those details were not available in the supplied advisory extraction, administrators should validate them directly in APSB26-151 before selecting an upgrade package.
This article may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Detection Guidance
Detection should focus on signs of unauthorized access to Forms JEE interfaces, unexpected execution from the application runtime, and post-exploitation activity. Because the vulnerable endpoint and exploit syntax are not publicly described, defenders should avoid relying on a single URL, parameter, or web application firewall signature.
Review reverse-proxy, application, operating-system, and endpoint telemetry around the disclosure date. Look for:
- Unauthenticated requests followed by server-side errors
- Unusual response sizes
- Configuration changes
- Child processes created by the Java application
- Web-shell artifacts
- Outbound connections from the Forms host
- New administrative accounts or scheduled tasks
- Unexpected modifications to application files
Correlate source IPs across multiple nodes and preserve relevant request bodies where policy and privacy controls permit.
Organizations evaluating endpoint telemetry or managed malware protection may also compare services such as Get Malwarebytes →, provided the product is validated against their environment and monitoring requirements.
Technical Notes
A generic Splunk query can identify suspicious process creation from Java-based application processes. Adapt the process names and parent-process fields to the deployment:
index=edr OR index=sysmon
(parent_process_name IN ("java","java.exe","jboss-modules.jar","start.jar")
OR parent_process_path="*java*")
| where process_name IN ("sh","bash","cmd.exe","powershell.exe","curl","wget","nc","ncat","python","perl")
| stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen
values(parent_process_command_line) as parent_cmd
values(process_command_line) as child_cmd
by host user parent_process_name process_name
| sort - count
On Linux systems, a focused audit rule can provide evidence of shell or network-tool execution by the service account. Confirm the correct service account before deployment and avoid changing audit policy without capacity testing:
sudo ausearch -m EXECVE \
-ts 2026-09-22 00:00:00 \
-i | grep -E '(/bin/sh|/bin/bash|curl|wget|nc|ncat|python|perl)'
A useful network detection pattern is an outbound connection from an AEM Forms host to an address or port not present in its approved dependency inventory, particularly when it occurs immediately after an unusual inbound request. This is a behavioral indicator, not a CVE-specific signature.
Remediation Steps
First, identify the exact AEM Forms JEE release and build on every node, then compare it with Adobe Security Bulletin APSB26-151.
The supplied records do not identify the vulnerable version range or fixed version number, so it would be unsafe to provide a fabricated target build. Administrators should obtain the applicable fixed release directly from Adobe and follow the bulletin’s installation procedure.
Until the fixed version is confirmed and installed:
- Remove direct internet access where it is not required.
- Restrict administrative and service interfaces to trusted networks.
- Enforce authentication at approved gateways.
- Limit access from untrusted network segments.
- Monitor for unusual process execution and outbound connections.
- Preserve relevant logs before making disruptive changes.
These measures are compensating controls only. They do not correct the authorization defect.
Technical Notes
A temporary Linux firewall control can restrict access to the Forms service to an approved management subnet. Replace the example interface, port, and subnet with values from the deployment. Test through an existing management path before applying the rule:
sudo nft add rule inet filter input iifname "eth0" tcp dport 8443 ip saddr != 10.20.0.0/16 drop
For a reverse proxy, restrict the affected application upstream to approved source networks. The exact Forms JEE endpoint is not identified in the public record, so apply the control at the virtual host or upstream that exposes the Forms service rather than copying an unverified endpoint path:
location / {
allow 10.20.0.0/16;
allow 192.0.2.10;
deny all;
proxy_pass http://aem_forms_jee;
}
There is no verified upgrade command or fixed version in the supplied evidence. Do not run a guessed package command or deploy a release from another Adobe product line.
After Adobe confirms the target build:
- Download the vendor-provided update.
- Follow Adobe’s documented installation and sequencing procedure.
- Update every cluster member, standby system, and relevant recovery environment.
- Verify the resulting version on each node.
- Restart services only according to Adobe’s instructions.
- Confirm that expected Forms functionality remains available.
- Review logs for failed updates, unauthorized access, or unexpected changes.
After remediation, review process, access, configuration, and outbound network logs for the period before patching. Rotate credentials or tokens if unauthorized access is suspected. Isolate affected hosts when evidence of code execution exists, and investigate persistence, modified application files, new scheduled tasks, and unexpected administrative accounts.